Page Summary
vnarod.livejournal.com - (no subject)
prof-bormental.livejournal.com - (no subject)
oldkettle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bad-cmpany.livejournal.com - (no subject)
affidavid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
just-one-of.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alexanderr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sydorov47.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 11:05 pm (UTC)Учение Маркса всесильно потому что оно верно!
no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 07:58 pm (UTC)Да-с. Больше ада.
no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 09:27 pm (UTC)Про преступность еще забыли, ее тоже надо больше и разной. Вообще, список тут длинный.
no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 11:26 pm (UTC)Спасибо, потрясающе.
no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 11:27 pm (UTC)Гениально! А как вы это находите в обход paywall?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 09:42 pm (UTC)Если это так, то получается, что Байден раздал кучу карманных ковидных денег страдальцам из хайтека, фин.сектора и к-стрит, которые итак материально выиграли от пандемии:
On the whole, consumer expenditures, which encompass both necessity spending (rent, gas, groceries) and discretionary spending (whatever you ordered from an Instagram ad after three glasses of happy-hour wine last Friday), account for about 70 percent of the country’s economy, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But that spending is not distributed equally. In a typical year, the most affluent 20 percent of people account for nearly 40 percent of the country’s consumer spending, and this wealthier group’s purchases are disproportionately discretionary.
Through the course of the pandemic, the situation has become even more lopsided. The affluent group spent much of 2020 working from home, largely insulated from mass unemployment and socking away the lion’s share of what Bloomberg Economics estimates as $2.3 trillion in extra cash that this group’s members might have otherwise spent on vacations or restaurant meals. Population-wide gains in spending power largely haven’t accrued to people with the most quality of life to gain from buying a few more things—they’ve gone to people for whom shopping is already a way of life.
After taking a dive in the first months of a pandemic, spending from this group began to rebound relatively quickly as fears of white-collar layoffs dissipated and people began sprucing up their houses and yards and wardrobes. Since this summer, the group’s shopping has escalated further, even as spending among people with lower incomes has fallen. The relatively well-off have returned to stores with money burning a hole in their pockets, gobbling up designer handbags, fine champagne, new cars, teeth whiteners, and pretty much anything else you can think of.
The problem with the explosion of this kind of discretionary shopping is that the same logistical resources that make this spike possible are also needed in other parts of the economy. The goods necessary to make school lunches—a vitally important civic function—might not be available for reasons that have nothing to do with how much food is theoretically available. Experienced workers and truck space and loading docks and time itself are not limitless resources. In a system asked to function beyond its capacity, if the distributor of hundred-dollar throw pillows can pay more for access to trucking capacity than a local food distributor that serves schools can, then their pillows go on the truck.
no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 10:06 pm (UTC)Вы и ваши итак за него проголосуете, "потому что Трамп"
А вот бедные(включая большую часть расовых меньшинств) не факт.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 11:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 11:10 pm (UTC)"Пока толстый сохнет - худой сдохнет".
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2021-10-26 01:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-10-24 11:29 pm (UTC)Jack это голова, палец в рот не клади!
no subject
Date: 2021-10-25 12:06 am (UTC)не очень понятно, почему он сразу бросился на hyperinflation.
почему все не остановится на фазе просто очень сильной инфляции.
ну, как в Аргентине, но не как в Зимбабве.
это раз. а во-вторых, есть ли точная грань между inflation
and hyperinflation? не думаю, что есть определение, с которым все одновременно согласны
а с третьей стороны у джека, при всей его ущербности
и других недостатках, может быть взгляд на вещи, который
не всем доступен. ну, как у миллиардера
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2021-10-25 12:00 am (UTC)Взгляд под интересным углом.
no subject
Date: 2021-10-25 05:52 pm (UTC)