Вероятно, что если бы выяснилось, что Бидон и Партия пьют на завтрак кровь свежеубиенных младенцев, то статьи о пользе подобной диеты не приминули бы появиться.
"The next recession, hopefully, will not be the result of a global pandemic. That means Congress is unlikely to provide the same level of support, and the Fed will have to do more to stimulate the economy. To do that, it needs higher nominal interest rates."
Про преступность еще забыли, ее тоже надо больше и разной. Вообще, список тут длинный.
Насколько я понял этого типа, сначала они увеличатся, чтобы было потом, куда уменьшать, и тут уже настанет благоденствие. https://www.wvnews.com/theet/opinion/columns/america-needs-higher-longer-lasting-inflation-and-heres-why/article_b3e9095a-2aa0-11ec-a159-1bba4741d98b.html
Если это так, то получается, что Байден раздал кучу карманных ковидных денег страдальцам из хайтека, фин.сектора и к-стрит, которые итак материально выиграли от пандемии:
On the whole, consumer expenditures, which encompass both necessity spending (rent, gas, groceries) and discretionary spending (whatever you ordered from an Instagram ad after three glasses of happy-hour wine last Friday), account for about 70 percent of the country’s economy, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But that spending is not distributed equally. In a typical year, the most affluent 20 percent of people account for nearly 40 percent of the country’s consumer spending, and this wealthier group’s purchases are disproportionately discretionary.
Through the course of the pandemic, the situation has become even more lopsided. The affluent group spent much of 2020 working from home, largely insulated from mass unemployment and socking away the lion’s share of what Bloomberg Economics estimates as $2.3 trillion in extra cash that this group’s members might have otherwise spent on vacations or restaurant meals. Population-wide gains in spending power largely haven’t accrued to people with the most quality of life to gain from buying a few more things—they’ve gone to people for whom shopping is already a way of life.
After taking a dive in the first months of a pandemic, spending from this group began to rebound relatively quickly as fears of white-collar layoffs dissipated and people began sprucing up their houses and yards and wardrobes. Since this summer, the group’s shopping has escalated further, even as spending among people with lower incomes has fallen. The relatively well-off have returned to stores with money burning a hole in their pockets, gobbling up designer handbags, fine champagne, new cars, teeth whiteners, and pretty much anything else you can think of.
The problem with the explosion of this kind of discretionary shopping is that the same logistical resources that make this spike possible are also needed in other parts of the economy. The goods necessary to make school lunches—a vitally important civic function—might not be available for reasons that have nothing to do with how much food is theoretically available. Experienced workers and truck space and loading docks and time itself are not limitless resources. In a system asked to function beyond its capacity, if the distributor of hundred-dollar throw pillows can pay more for access to trucking capacity than a local food distributor that serves schools can, then their pillows go on the truck.
У меня есть гипотеза, что огромные раздачи денег и дефициты отчасти задуманы именно с целью разогнать инфляцию. И не потому что это на самом деле хорошо для страна, а для того чтобы исправить ситуацию с имущественным неравенством. Ведь беднякам по любому терять нечего, а богачи могут лишиться своего богатства хотя бы частично, но лучше полностью.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Учение Маркса всесильно потому что оно верно!
no subject
Да-с. Больше ада.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Про преступность еще забыли, ее тоже надо больше и разной. Вообще, список тут длинный.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Спасибо, потрясающе.
no subject
no subject
Гениально! А как вы это находите в обход paywall?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Если это так, то получается, что Байден раздал кучу карманных ковидных денег страдальцам из хайтека, фин.сектора и к-стрит, которые итак материально выиграли от пандемии:
On the whole, consumer expenditures, which encompass both necessity spending (rent, gas, groceries) and discretionary spending (whatever you ordered from an Instagram ad after three glasses of happy-hour wine last Friday), account for about 70 percent of the country’s economy, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But that spending is not distributed equally. In a typical year, the most affluent 20 percent of people account for nearly 40 percent of the country’s consumer spending, and this wealthier group’s purchases are disproportionately discretionary.
Through the course of the pandemic, the situation has become even more lopsided. The affluent group spent much of 2020 working from home, largely insulated from mass unemployment and socking away the lion’s share of what Bloomberg Economics estimates as $2.3 trillion in extra cash that this group’s members might have otherwise spent on vacations or restaurant meals. Population-wide gains in spending power largely haven’t accrued to people with the most quality of life to gain from buying a few more things—they’ve gone to people for whom shopping is already a way of life.
After taking a dive in the first months of a pandemic, spending from this group began to rebound relatively quickly as fears of white-collar layoffs dissipated and people began sprucing up their houses and yards and wardrobes. Since this summer, the group’s shopping has escalated further, even as spending among people with lower incomes has fallen. The relatively well-off have returned to stores with money burning a hole in their pockets, gobbling up designer handbags, fine champagne, new cars, teeth whiteners, and pretty much anything else you can think of.
The problem with the explosion of this kind of discretionary shopping is that the same logistical resources that make this spike possible are also needed in other parts of the economy. The goods necessary to make school lunches—a vitally important civic function—might not be available for reasons that have nothing to do with how much food is theoretically available. Experienced workers and truck space and loading docks and time itself are not limitless resources. In a system asked to function beyond its capacity, if the distributor of hundred-dollar throw pillows can pay more for access to trucking capacity than a local food distributor that serves schools can, then their pillows go on the truck.
no subject
no subject
Вы и ваши итак за него проголосуете, "потому что Трамп"
А вот бедные(включая большую часть расовых меньшинств) не факт.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
"Пока толстый сохнет - худой сдохнет".
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Jack это голова, палец в рот не клади!
no subject
не очень понятно, почему он сразу бросился на hyperinflation.
почему все не остановится на фазе просто очень сильной инфляции.
ну, как в Аргентине, но не как в Зимбабве.
это раз. а во-вторых, есть ли точная грань между inflation
and hyperinflation? не думаю, что есть определение, с которым все одновременно согласны
а с третьей стороны у джека, при всей его ущербности
и других недостатках, может быть взгляд на вещи, который
не всем доступен. ну, как у миллиардера
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Взгляд под интересным углом.
no subject