ny_quant: (Default)
[personal profile] ny_quant
Собирался это опубликовать ещё позавчера, но тут началась заваруха и стало не до этого.

As Republicans in Congress prepare to formally contest the outcome of the 2020 presidential election on Wednesday, many of them have cited precedent for their effort: similar complaints lodged by Democrats in other presidential elections. After Republican victories in 2000, 2004 and 2016, for instance, Democrats in Congress used the formal counting of electoral votes as an opportunity to challenge election results.

Few objections were filed in accordance with the Electoral Count Act in the 20th century. But starting with George W. Bush’s victory in the 2000 presidential election, Democrats contested election results after every Republican win. In January 2001, Representative Alcee Hastings of Florida objected to counting his state’s electoral votes because of “overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to suppress voter turnout.” Representative Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas referred to the “millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida’s inaccurate vote count.” Representative Maxine Waters of California characterized Florida’s electoral votes as “fraudulent.”

Vice President Al Gore presided over the meeting in 2001. He overruled these objections because no senator joined them. Part of the reason they didn’t join, presumably, was that Mr. Gore conceded the election a month earlier. In January 2005, in the wake of Mr. Bush’s re-election, Democrats were more aggressive. Senator Barbara Boxer of California joined Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio to lodge a formal objection to Ohio’s electoral votes. The objection compelled Congress to spend two hours in debate, even though Mr. Bush won Ohio by more than 118,000 votes. Representative Barbara Lee of California claimed that “the Democratic process was thwarted.” Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York said that the right to vote was “stolen.” Ms. Waters objected too, dedicating her objection to the documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, whose 2004 movie “Fahrenheit 9/11” painted a dark (and at times factually debatable) picture of the Bush presidency.

The motion failed, but not before 31 members of the House, and Ms. Boxer in the Senate, voted to reject Ohio’s electoral votes — effectively voting to disenfranchise the people of Ohio in the Electoral College. In January 2017, after Donald Trump’s victory, Democrats in Congress once again challenged the election outcome. Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts cited “the confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia.” Ms. Lee of California argued that Michigan’s electoral votes should be thrown out because “people are horrified by the overwhelming evidence of Russian interference in our elections.” She also cited “the malfunction of 87 voting machines.” There were objections against the votes in at least nine states. To his credit, Vice President Joe Biden rejected each objection on procedural grounds, stating that “there is no debate” and “it is over.”
Then as now, each member of Congress was within his or her rights to make an objection. But the objections were naïve at best, shameless at worst. Either way, the readiness of members of Congress to disenfranchise millions of Americans was disconcerting.

Date: 2021-01-08 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olaff67.livejournal.com
В 2001 году некто Дональд как раз вступил в ряды демократов - вот там-то он и понабрался всего этого!

Date: 2021-01-08 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninazino.livejournal.com
Да, безобразники демы учинили прецеденты, но во всех тех случаях хотя бы проигравшие признавали победу оппонента задолго даже до собрания выборщиков, не говоря уж о Конгрессе.

И, сколько я помню, никто не раскачивал массы на тему того, что выборы украли. То есть это был у них такой междусобойчик, у негодников.

Date: 2021-01-08 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] muh2.livejournal.com
Ну да. Заваруха началась. Какой уж теперь формальный протест.

Date: 2021-01-08 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yucca.livejournal.com
Отличная демонстрация разницы между обычным политическим цирком и национальным кризисом. Переход количества в качество, как нас учил дедушка Гегель.

Date: 2021-01-08 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
It shows how much our democracy depends on the personal qualities of the presidential candidates, specifically their ability co concede. It is a bit disconcerting..

Date: 2021-01-09 02:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sydorov47.livejournal.com
А теперь есть шанс, что тема будет закрыта.

Все что нужно для этого - отмена филибастера и преобразование DC и Пуэрто Рико в штаты.

А далее по тем самым букварям, по которым мы учились.

Date: 2021-01-09 07:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com
I think there is an obvious reason why you have not heard about these challenges until now.

Profile

ny_quant: (Default)
ny_quant

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 02:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios