ny_quant: (Default)
[personal profile] ny_quant

Date: 2022-12-16 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldkettle.livejournal.com
You are shooting the messenger

Date: 2022-12-16 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moneo.livejournal.com
No, I'm performing a smell test. This dude smells hella rotten.

Date: 2022-12-16 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
You need to have your nose looked at.

Date: 2022-12-16 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
И кстати нагуглил первоисточник: https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Bjorn_Lomborg#cite_note-8
Зря вы туда ходите, это таки пидарасы в плохом смысле.

Ссылка на http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/11/22/scientists-debunk-lomborg/
не работает.

Date: 2022-12-17 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moneo.livejournal.com
А вы им задонатьте, чтобы у них была возможность постоянно проверять ссылки на тухлость :) Забейте название в гугл, найдете зеркало.

Date: 2022-12-17 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com

Кстати, эти люди, конкретно Joe Romm, - платный пропагандон за алармизм, но это наверное хорошо и правильно, да?

Date: 2022-12-16 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldkettle.livejournal.com
what I meant was
He is not the author of the article in Lancet, is he? If you disagree with the article - by all means, show the world your workings. But he just linked to it and extracted a tiny bit, attacking him is shooting the messenger by definition.

Date: 2022-12-17 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moneo.livejournal.com
He's a magpie. He picks up shiny things and adds them to his hoard. Only he's a magpie with an agenda: to him, the shiny things are bits of legitimate research that can be used to attack the scientific consensus on climate.

Date: 2022-12-17 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldkettle.livejournal.com
As ХЭБ explained very clearly on multiple occasions, there is a not so subtle difference between scientific consensus on the fact of warming, still relatively scientific projections of the possible extent of the warming and absolutely political and completely anti-scientific plans of dealing with the warming. The reference above does not question close to your heart facts but points at another reason the narrative supporting planned actions is wrong. And you are shooting the messenger.

Date: 2022-12-17 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com

That's another lie that climate alarmist activists sold you. In fact, there is no consensus on climate other than it will be warmer. And he is a part of this consensus.

Profile

ny_quant: (Default)
ny_quant

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12 34 56
7 89 10 111213
14 151617 181920
21 2223 24252627
28 29 3031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 05:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios