А ларчик просто открывался

[ny_quant]

Неутомимый юзер e2pii1 нашел простое и понятное объяснению дебильному поведению европейцев, которые жгут древесину и полагают что это очень зелено и прогрессивно, о чем я сообщал неделю назад.

https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2021/07/us/american-south-biomass-energy-invs/

How the American South is paying the price for Europe's 'green' energy.
In its Renewable Energy Directive (RED), the EU classified biomass as a renewable energy source.
Burning wood is less efficient than burning coal and releases far more carbon into the atmosphere, according to almost 800 scientists who wrote a 2018 letter to the European parliament.
In 1996, scientists at the United Nations devised a method to measure global carbon emissions. To simplify the process, they suggested emissions from burning biomass should be calculated where the trees are cut down, not where the wood pellets are burned.

Вот это последнее я как-то не уловил из статьи в Таймс, которую я нашел сам.

scientists at the United Nations - это звучит гордо!

Comments

[spamsink]

Above ground carbon, as far as its total amount is relatively constant, as it was for millennia, fluctuates back and forth between the atmosphere and the biomass more or less in sync with long-term solar activity.

It is only the carbon coming from the underground which skews the equilibrium.

[ny-quant.livejournal.com]

Это верно.

[e2pii1.livejournal.com]

Судя по действиям "борцов с климатом", только carbon coming from the white people skews the equilibrium, carbon coming from yellow, black and muslim people is completely harmless.

[ny-quant.livejournal.com]

Not really. They are very much concerned with emissions from China and India.