А. Тогда не вижу проблемы, как и было сказано выше. Я полагаю, на этот счёт есть всякие кодексы, правила и законы - вот по ним и надо действовать, строго в соответствии с.
Видимо, степень наказания должна зависеть от ощутимости ущерба или потенциального ущерба, как-то так.
if there was something there, she would have been punished. indeed, if her little indiscretions were discovered when she was in state dep., she would have been fired, likely. it was all discovered LATER. there is nothing criminal about what she had done, except possible lying under oath, and that's hard to prove. so "lock her up" cries were silly.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2017-09-26 06:11 pm (UTC)А можно контекст? А то я не понимаю вопроса.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-26 06:34 pm (UTC)Группу товарищей из белого дома, в частности Кушнера, уличили в использовании частных email accounts.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-26 06:53 pm (UTC)А. Тогда не вижу проблемы, как и было сказано выше. Я полагаю, на этот счёт есть всякие кодексы, правила и законы - вот по ним и надо действовать, строго в соответствии с.
Видимо, степень наказания должна зависеть от ощутимости ущерба или потенциального ущерба, как-то так.
no subject
Date: 2017-09-29 09:27 am (UTC)that's why "lock her up" was stupid, too.
if there was something there, she would have been punished. indeed, if her little indiscretions were discovered when she was in state dep., she would have been fired, likely. it was all discovered LATER. there is nothing criminal about what she had done, except possible lying under oath, and that's hard to prove. so "lock her up" cries were silly.
same with the kushies.
manafort though?? we'll see.