Obamacare “repeal”
Mar. 7th, 2017 03:45 pm
А где-нибудь в ЖЖ уже обсуждают какой это прекрасный план и как Трамп быстро выполнит очередное предвыборное обещание? Кстати, уважуха консерваторам которые против.
А где-нибудь в ЖЖ уже обсуждают какой это прекрасный план и как Трамп быстро выполнит очередное предвыборное обещание? Кстати, уважуха консерваторам которые против.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-08 09:40 pm (UTC)I have something with my shoulder - need to see orthopedist. I'll survive without it, so technically I'm not in real need, but the quality of life is definitely lower if I can't lift a tea pot full of water without pain. That is kind of sad for those who unlike me can't pay for visit and most importantly, needed treatment.
So while I generally agree with the safety net concept for the extreme cases, I'd be careful about details - what exactly such net covers.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-08 09:45 pm (UTC)before you summon up so much compassion for those shoulders ;-) - think of HOW these people show up in charity care. often wearing thousands of dollars in bling. my colleague wellnessusa says she saw it.. a lot. and i see it too.
no papa Karlo who sells his jacket to be seen by a doctor. nopes. more lika Papa Karlo grudgingly agreeing to buy less coke this week so he can send his wife to a GYN clinic for $200.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-09 08:04 pm (UTC)Shoulders don't attract your mercy, I get it ;-)
I believe you. But the concern is that by profiling those who show up to those clinics we aren't getting correct profile of those who need help (with their shoulders). So the case studying actual patients there could be misleading somewhat.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-09 08:12 pm (UTC)the point is not the bling and the diamonds in the teeth of those using charity care.
we will never get a "correct profile" unless people show up.
an aching shoulder usually .. stops aching, unless it is like a rotator cuff tear, for example. there are lots of futile, unnecessary visits by patients of all sorts to all sorts of clinics. so levels of care need to be tiered in a way that serious clients are not discarded, and bogus customers - LOTS of them seekigng disability - are filtered.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-09 11:21 pm (UTC)Serious and unnecessary clients - is that division a priori or a posterior?
Off topic: how data profiling can be racist is a mystery to me...
no subject
Date: 2017-03-09 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-09 11:37 pm (UTC)Still don't see it. Than can be biased - for sure, but how is that racist?
And the honest data collecting itself - how can it be characterized by usages? It's a problem of who is using, not the objective data collectors.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-11 12:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 02:34 pm (UTC)According to its definition, racism isn't a bias at all, it's a system of views with certain typical characteristics like stating superiority in something based on racial traits.
In simple words, to be racist, researcher must believe that certain race is superior and behave accordingly. Just sampling bias doesn't fit here (or I don't see how it fits).
no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 05:06 pm (UTC)Your definition shares the same core: statement of race-specific traits. This is common for all definitions, differences are in small details specific to considered areas of application. So, all the same.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 05:15 pm (UTC)An example is easy to find. The reason I have spent time debating the racism is... Trump, of course. A lot of people call him a racist just because they are offended by him. But it doesn't make him a racist, I haven't seen a single racist statement of his that would clearly fit the definition (any of them). And there were people trying to find such and show to me. They couldn't.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 07:20 pm (UTC)i love it.
no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-14 07:12 pm (UTC)