Сабина подрывает веру в науку
Nov. 23rd, 2024 03:39 pmWebb Falsified Dark Matter Prediction – And No One Cares
Data collected by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope is in conflict with predictions based on the hypothesis of dark matter and instead confirmed predictions made with Modified Newtonian Dynamics, MOND. While the failure of dark matter has been widely discussed as galaxies that are “too big” or “too old”, little has been said about the success of MOND. In a paper that just appeared, we have an excellent summary of the present situation, and it doesn’t look good for dark matter at all.
"It's like covering US election results with "Kamala lost" because you're afraid to mention Trump"!
Data collected by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope is in conflict with predictions based on the hypothesis of dark matter and instead confirmed predictions made with Modified Newtonian Dynamics, MOND. While the failure of dark matter has been widely discussed as galaxies that are “too big” or “too old”, little has been said about the success of MOND. In a paper that just appeared, we have an excellent summary of the present situation, and it doesn’t look good for dark matter at all.
"It's like covering US election results with "Kamala lost" because you're afraid to mention Trump"!
no subject
Date: 2024-11-27 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-11-27 05:10 am (UTC)Какого гонору поубавить? Все знают, что к LCDM модели огромное количество вопросов. Если вы думаете, что есть заговор по продвижению LCDM, то вы ошибаетесь — если кто-то завтра придет с квантовоной релятивстской моделью MOND, которая лучше объясняет наблюдаемые явления, то ему только спасибо скажут. Можно даже просто с релятивисткой. А если честно то даже лучшее попадание в наблюдаемые данные будет огромным аргументом. Пока есть лучшее попадание в очень ограниченом куске данных.