Проигранные пари

[ny_quant]

4 года назад я выиграл два пари у товарищей справа, которые думали, что Байден уйдет сразу после избрания. (Одну бутылку мне все еще должны, кхе кхе, из-за проблем с доставкой. И еще одно пари по другому пари я тоже выиграл, но похоже что выигрыш никогда не увижу.)

Одновременно, я заключил два одинаковых пари с друзьями слева, где я предсказывал, что Байден уйдет к концу 2023, и проиграл. Бывает. I put my money where my mouth was.

То, что произошло вчера я видел в хрустальном шаре еще 4 года назад с предельной ясностью. Уже тогда было совершенно очевидно, что Байден физически не будет способен отслужить второй срок. Мое предположение было в том, что к концу 2023 это будет очевидно и самому Байдену и его окружению. Как я ошибся, как наказан двумя бутылками скотча!

Оказалось, что в окружении Байдена работают полные дебилы. Ну ведь можно же было на худой конец сказать, что the president doesn't debate convicted felons или что-то в этом духе. Это было бы не здорово, но все же не так ужасно.

Я не знаю есть ли еще нормальные разумные силы в демпартии.

Между тем, некоторые товарищи слева агитируют за новый билет в составе Харрис-М.Обама. Good luck with that.

4 года с 2016 по 2020 мы кое-как пережили, надеюсь и еще 4 года переживем.

В Израиле и РФ наверное праздник, а Украине наверное конец.

Comments

[v s (from livejournal.com)]

Again, you're mixing up two completely different situations in order to advance your agenda. One was born with dual features, another "decided to switch" in the middle of the life with no supporting evidence whatsoever except of "I have a feeling". But to answer your question I think intersex people ( apparently hermaphrodite is not politically correct anymore ) have much bigger problems since most of them suffer from genetic deficiencies unlike si called "trans" people. And we never had an issue with intersex people using the wrong locker room, had me?

If a man cuts his penis off he is still a man but with no penis.

[ny-quant.livejournal.com]

> with no supporting evidence

What kind of evidence would you find acceptable?

And why anyone needs to prove anything to anyone, outside of changing room issue?

E.g. someone calls themselves an artist. You can opine that this is not art, looks more like piece of shit. But guess what? Your approval is not required.

Or, until recently, your party maintained that marriage is a union between and women. Then it turned out that same sex couples can proclaim themselves being in love - with no supporting evidence whatsoever except of "we have a feeling". And as much as "conservative" homophobes hate it, no one owes them any evidence.

So the bathrooms is their last stand, last chance to exclude some minority group from something.

> I think intersex people ( apparently hermaphrodite is not politically correct anymore ) have much bigger problems since most of them suffer from genetic deficiencies

I don't know. One should look at the rate of suicides, among other things. And trans people are obviously quite sick in their heads as well. It could also be genetic, just not at the chromosome level.

> And we never had an issue with intersex people using the wrong locker room, had me?

Exactly! And why do you think that is? Just imagine: a person with a penis walks into women's changing room or the same person with a vagina walks into men's. How can it be good? Why did it never bother anybody?!

> If a man cuts his penis off he is still a man but with no penis.

So a person with vagina and w/o penis and testicles is still a man for you. OK, noted. Asked and answered.