ny_quant: (Default)
[personal profile] ny_quant
Пришел к власти хороший добрый дедушка Байден, и давай подписывать executive orders as if there is no tomorrow. Из 10 самых важных, которые CNN выделила жирным шрифтом, я поддерживаю один, не имею мнения по одному, не в курсе дела по двум, и против шести. Представляю как рады товарищи справа.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/22/politics/joe-biden-executive-orders-first-week/index.html

Понятно, что Трамп всё равно хуже, но это отдельно.

А кстати, ходят слухи что Тамп хочет создать свою партию. Вот это было бы здорово. Тогда бы, может быть, к оставшимся умеренным республиканцам присоединились бы умеренные демократы и образовали бы нечто разумное. Я знаю, что размечтался.

Date: 2021-01-22 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
"Requires non-citizens to be included in the Census and apportionment of congressional representatives "

Strange, I thought it was more or less a constitutional requirement. At least that is how it has been done for a very long time.

Date: 2021-01-22 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
// I thought it was more or less a constitutional requirement

Не знаю, впервые слышу.

Date: 2021-01-22 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
Decennial U.S. Census figures are based on actual counts of persons dwelling in U.S. residential structures. They include citizens, non-citizen legal residents, non-citizen long-term visitors and undocumented immigrants. The Census Bureau bases its decision about whom to count on the concept of usual residence. Usual residence, a principle established by the Census Act of 1790, is defined as the place a person lives and sleeps most of the time. The Census Bureau uses special procedures to ensure that those without conventional housing are counted; however, data from these operations are not considered to be as accurate as data obtained from traditional procedures.[5]

Date: 2021-01-23 01:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
That's not Constitution, is it?

Date: 2021-01-23 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
That's how it has been interpreted since the beginning with the exception of the 3/5th compromise.

This is the exact text, actually:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/full-text

Date: 2021-01-23 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
This is the 14th Amendment:

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.


So yes, it quite explicit in the Constitution.

I suspect, only Trump would mess with something like that, given that it is in the Constitution and its historical connection to slavery.
Edited Date: 2021-01-23 02:50 am (UTC)

Date: 2021-01-23 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
Many EOs, Trump's and Obama's in particular, were appealed in courts. Why not this one?

Date: 2021-01-23 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
Apparently (unless I am misreading something) there was already a Supreme Court hearing: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-census/u-s-supreme-court-weighs-trump-bid-to-bar-illegal-immigrants-from-census-totals-idUSKBN2890F4

I presume it would get overturned in the SC in any case, the language of the 14th Amendment is unambiguous.

Date: 2021-01-23 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
Я все равно не согласен. Это какой-то representation w/o taxation.

Date: 2021-01-23 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ok-its-the-last.livejournal.com
Почему without taxation? Легальные резиденты налоги платят так же, как и граждане, нет?

Date: 2021-01-24 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
Many illegals pay taxes as well.

Date: 2021-01-24 05:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
Нелегалы подоходных налогов не платят.

Date: 2021-01-24 01:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
Well, first it is the right decision to reverse the Trump's mindless EO simply because it is a constitutional principle which cannot be changed easily.

More to the heart of the matter, I just don't see it that way. Nobody _represents_ the interest of non-citizens, legal or illegal, their number simply go toward the count. Just like the slaves who counted for 3/5 were obviously not represented in the Congress. The owners were.

I actually do not understand why legal residents who are paying taxes cannot vote at least in local/state elections. That is taxation without representation.

As far as the illegal residents are concerned, many of them pay taxes as well: IRS estimates that about 6 million unauthorized immigrants file individual income tax returns each year(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_impact_of_illegal_immigrants_in_the_United_States#Relative_contribution_by_income_tax_bracket)





Date: 2021-01-24 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
Well, I'll have to bend the knee to the Constitution if that's what it says but I still disagree - it should be changed.

I don't see why anyone needs to represent interests of illegals in the legislature. I do agree about legal non-citizens though.

Interesting about 6 million unauthorized immigrants filing individual income tax returns each year. I wonder why they would do that. My best guess is to get some money from the gov-t.

Date: 2021-01-24 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
Well, good luck changing the Constitution :)

> I don't see why anyone needs to represent interests of illegals in the legislature. I do agree about legal non-citizens though.

I agree that there is no intrinsic reason why people who are in the country illegally have to be represented in legislature. However, simply counting them is not representation and was never intended as such.

For those legally in the country, I would do something quite simple -- if you pay taxes for 3 years, you can vote in local/state elections, after 5 years you can vote in federal elections as well (the last may be anticonstitutional, unfortunately, I am not sure, but the first can definitely be done easily).

> Interesting about 6 million unauthorized immigrants filing individual income tax returns each year. I wonder why they would do that. My best guess is to get some money from the gov-t.

I can see a lot of good reasons they might want to pay taxes. For example if you overstayed a student or work visa,
you are technically in the country illegally but you definitely would not want to commit a federal crime by tax avoidance. A lot of the dreamers have social security numbers and are continuing to pay taxes with the hope of getting citizenship one day. And so on.

(I did not do any digging in the data, it is an interesting question but no time now, so it is all speculation).

Date: 2021-01-22 11:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] misha-b.livejournal.com
I think historical precedent for not counting non-citizens is from the times of slavery when slaves (who were not citizens, of course) counted as 3/5 of a person.
Edited Date: 2021-01-23 12:01 am (UTC)

Date: 2021-01-25 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
В опросниках переписи когда-то был пункт "есть ли у вас американское гражданство", потом его убрали. Трамп его вернул или хотел вернуть (точно не помню.) По утверждению демократов он сделал это для того, чтобы иммигранты испугались и не стали участвовать в переписи (очевидно, имеются в виду нелегалы недокументированные иммигранты, которые должны были испугаться, что их вычислят)

Date: 2021-01-25 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Видимо, дело не в этом, а в каких-то правилах обработки данных о гражданстве https ://www.npr.org/2021/01/22/959609263/biden-administration-tables-trumps-citizenship-data-request-for-redistricting

Date: 2021-01-25 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com
Про это я слышал, но это совсем уж вряд ли constitutional requirement.

Profile

ny_quant: (Default)
ny_quant

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 07:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios