![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Демократического централизма псто
Вроде как пора уже привыкнуть ничему не удивляться, но вот опять.
For the better part of four years, Pramila Jayapal was like most of the 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives ... [Now she] took over as chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Under her leadership, the caucus has gone from an ineffective assemblage to a focused voice for the left flank of the Democratic Party. Jayapal has strictly enforced a new rule requiring the 98 members to vote with the group at least two-thirds of the time on bills where the caucus has taken a position
For the better part of four years, Pramila Jayapal was like most of the 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives ... [Now she] took over as chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Under her leadership, the caucus has gone from an ineffective assemblage to a focused voice for the left flank of the Democratic Party. Jayapal has strictly enforced a new rule requiring the 98 members to vote with the group at least two-thirds of the time on bills where the caucus has taken a position
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Индусска приехала в Америку в 16 лет.
И 3-й срок представляет Сиэтл с пригордами в Конгрессе.
The change came after Jayapal—now in her third term, representing most of Seattle and some key suburbs—took over as chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Under her leadership, the caucus has gone from an ineffective assemblage to a focused voice for the left flank of the Democratic Party.
“I’m a dog with a bone. If I have an idea that I think is the right idea, I will keep pushing it,” she said in an interview at her Capitol Hill office.
Jayapal has emerged as the most powerful House liberal by aggressively representing the priorities of her caucus and pushing leaders not to acquiesce to the demands of moderates in politically competitive districts.
no subject
Кому и кобыла невеста.
no subject
Вы - получите пачку клонов MTG в 2022.
Заслуженно:)
no subject
no subject
Поза.
В реальности вы активный антикрасный, антирозовый и антитрампер.
no subject
Верно, хоть это и не полный список. И как это противоречит тому что я сказал?
no subject
Плохой прецедент.
no subject
Будьте готовы к партийным чисткам.
Представьте себе Ayanna Pressley с маузером и в кожанке.
К слову - вот так MTG к власти и приходят - когда у них в противниках откровенные большевики.
no subject
ABC Australia:
It's a weird thing living in America coming from a country like Australia where Medicare and heavily subsidised education are taken for granted.
To us, their policies are not quite radical. Fuel for valid political debate and prioritisation of public funds to be sure, but to suggest the United States might imminently turn into Venezuela seems like a big leap.
And it is.
Universal healthcare and subsidised education are hardly precursors to state control and the death of the American free market.
But in the post-truth era, the target audience doesn't care about the fine details.
Some Americans would be literally reaching for their guns and gathering the militia at the very suggestion that the federal government might try to interfere in their existence.
Mr Trump proved in 2016 that he's excellent at creating villains.
Так что у вас много возможностей сражаться с ПОБЕДИВШИМИ(!) большевиками по месту жительства.
no subject
no subject
представлял какой-то округ с какими-то пригорoдами в рейхстаге.
The change came after Hitler took over as chair of the рейхстаг Progressive Caucus. Under his leadership, the caucus has gone from an ineffective assemblage to a focused voice for the left flank of the German politics.
“I’m a dog with a bone. If I have an idea that I think is the right idea, I will keep pushing it,” he said.
Hitler has emerged as the most powerful House progressive by aggressively representing the priorities of his caucus and pushing leaders not to acquiesce to the demands of moderates in politically competitive districts.
Гитлер в 1933 мог сказать про себя то же самое что Вы рассказали в "похвалу" левацкой дряни Jayapal. Если между ними и есть какая разница, то столь несущественная что Вы не удосужились её помянуть.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Но, но... я один удивлен _квотами_ на конформизм? Кто из своих будет иметь право голосовать против повестки, а кто нет? По каким критериям?
no subject
no subject
Да и две трети выглядит как весьма низкий порог.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Вспомнилось из старого:
- Вы член партии?
- Нет. Я её мозг.
no subject
В каждой избушке свои погремушки.
no subject
no subject
Ей только такой способ остаётся.
no subject
no subject
Меня впечатлило, за что прославляют и ценят эту молодую коммуно-фашистку её сторонники:
https://ny-quant.livejournal.com/927589.html?thread=13209957#t13209957
no subject
Хотя, конечно, все не так просто - членство в Progressive Caucus неофициально скорее всего несет некие бенефиты, особенно среди активистов их избирателей.
no subject
https://www.google.com/search?q=progressive+caucus+fund&rlz=1C1CHBF_en-GBAU904AU904&oq=progressive+caucus+fund&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30.16762j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
no subject
Мне кажется это нормально если клуб по интересам собирает деньги на продвижение этих интересов.
no subject
Вот эти деньги и есть те самые бенефиты. Если ты не на ихнем кавказе, то и денежек, ими собраных, тебе не дадут.
no subject
no subject