![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Leading consultancies assess climate transition
Только сливки.
McKinsey:
Capital spending on physical assets for energy and land-use systems in the net-zero transition between 2021 and 2050 would amount to about $275 trillion, or $9.2 trillion per year on average, an annual increase of as much as $3.5 trillion from today. To put this increase in comparative terms, the $3.5 trillion is approximately equivalent, in 2020, to half of global corporate profits, one-quarter of total tax revenue, and 7 percent of household spending.
The transition could result in a gain of about 200 million and a loss of about 185 million direct and indirect jobs globally by 2050.
Our estimates exceed to a meaningful degree the $3 trillion to $4.5 trillion of annual spending for the net-zero transition that others have estimated.
Deloitte:
Over the past 50 years the US has suffered a total of $1.4 trillion dollars due to weather, climate and water hazards.
In 2021 alone there were 20 separate billion dollar weather and climate disasters in the US.
With average warming of 3°C by century end, failing to take sufficient action could result in economic losses to the US of $14.5 trillion in present-value dollars over the next 50 years.
Wood MacKenzie:
Our analysis suggests that much of the lasting economic benefits will materialise beyond our forecast horizon of 2050. (!!!)
Collating third-party results on climate damage impacts, we estimate that avoiding a higher temperature increase could boost global GDP, on aggregate, by 1.6% in 2050. At the same time, however, the actions required to successfully mitigate global warming to 1.5°C could knock 3.6% off GDP in 2050.
Все тут грамотные, цифры говорят сами за себя, анализировать тут в общем нечего. Если это не коллективное безумие, то я не знаю что.
McKinsey:
Capital spending on physical assets for energy and land-use systems in the net-zero transition between 2021 and 2050 would amount to about $275 trillion, or $9.2 trillion per year on average, an annual increase of as much as $3.5 trillion from today. To put this increase in comparative terms, the $3.5 trillion is approximately equivalent, in 2020, to half of global corporate profits, one-quarter of total tax revenue, and 7 percent of household spending.
The transition could result in a gain of about 200 million and a loss of about 185 million direct and indirect jobs globally by 2050.
Our estimates exceed to a meaningful degree the $3 trillion to $4.5 trillion of annual spending for the net-zero transition that others have estimated.
Deloitte:
Over the past 50 years the US has suffered a total of $1.4 trillion dollars due to weather, climate and water hazards.
In 2021 alone there were 20 separate billion dollar weather and climate disasters in the US.
With average warming of 3°C by century end, failing to take sufficient action could result in economic losses to the US of $14.5 trillion in present-value dollars over the next 50 years.
Wood MacKenzie:
Our analysis suggests that much of the lasting economic benefits will materialise beyond our forecast horizon of 2050. (!!!)
Collating third-party results on climate damage impacts, we estimate that avoiding a higher temperature increase could boost global GDP, on aggregate, by 1.6% in 2050. At the same time, however, the actions required to successfully mitigate global warming to 1.5°C could knock 3.6% off GDP in 2050.
Все тут грамотные, цифры говорят сами за себя, анализировать тут в общем нечего. Если это не коллективное безумие, то я не знаю что.
no subject
Какие конкретно политические расчеты у всех этих мерзавцев в Конгрессе я не знаю. Но одно совершенно очевидно: никто не полевел. Решили, что им будет политически выгодно на следующих выборах предъявить очередные "достижения" pissing away another couple of trillions - and that's all there is to it.
Но я говорил, не о BBB, а о GND. Если бы демократический электорат был реально двумя руками за это безумие, то номинировали бы главного ебаната Сандерса. Но случилось не это. Уже понятно, что факты, которые не вписываются в вашу воображаемую картину мира, вас не интересуют, так что давайте на этом закончим.
no subject
GND в Америке ?
Вы похожи на Трампа когда он расписывает спасем Америку от радикально левых Пелось на свои раллях.
Если бы я вначале знал что вы под озеленением понимаете не меньше чем GND, я бы не стал тратить время на первый коммент.
(frozen comment) no subject
no subject
Когда Берни спрашивали, вы даете себе отчет сколько это будет стоить, он всегда спрашивал: По сравнению с чем?
Имея ввиду фактически триллионный военный бюджет( формально на бумаге он поменьше).
На этом интервьюеры переходили к следующим вопросам.
(frozen comment) no subject
Причем Берни ещё тот голубь:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/mar/02/facebook-posts/no-bernie-sanders-didnt-vote-favor-every-war-durin/
Интервьюеры, понятное дело, говно.