Точно! Вместо того чтобы принять наконец закон, о том чтобы добавить его светлейший лик на гору Рашмор! Вот же чем должны заниматься правильные законодатели!
no subject
v s (from livejournal.com)2025-09-09 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
This one is even better although not quite so salacious.
US Energy department posted the following on X a day ago: "Wind and solar energy infrastructure is essentially worthless when it is dark outside, and when the wind is not blowing."
Республиканцы давно такие корки мочат.. Найдите выступление техасца, члена комитета по науке, космосу и технологиям про таяние льда и реакцию Джона Стюарта)) Everything’s bigger in Texas, even the stupid
But DOE used to be a serious organization, with high level physicists, even Nobel prize winners, leading it. Compare it to this caveman-level nonsense they are spouting now.
This is not dems or reps -- this is DOE, a formerly serious organization which supports physics research and many other things.
> So, what nonsense are you talking about.
The energy infrastructure is obviously not worthless, even if it does not produce energy continuously. This is like saying that my furniture is worthless when I am not at home.
As an observation it is caveman-level. I don't need the DOE to tell me that when it is dark the solar panels do produce energy. I doubt anyone learns anything new from this.
The more interesting question is why DOE feels compelled to post this. The likely answer is that they are simply parroting Trump who keeps saying such things to disparage wind/solar.
Right, "In September 2025, Wright wrote on social media platform X that solar power cannot meet global energy demands and that covering the entire planet in solar panels would only provide 20% of demand."
They are not making some sort of reasoned argument.
In any case, getting rid of fossil fuels will take a long time, but they can be mostly replaced for electric power generation by some combination of nuclear/renewables. Nuclear needs to be a lot cheaper though.
Not really. China's policy is "all of the above". They understand they need energy and they are willing to get it from all sources. No ideology, just practicality. They expand nuclear, solar and coal all at the same time. While various idiots in our country fight each other.
If you look at the table by year, the change in solar from 2023 to 2024 is massive and accounts for almost 50% of the total change (most of the rest is hydro + wind, I was surprised nuclear did not increase much).
A lot of solar capacity has been installed over the last few years and has been coming online very recently. I could not tell from the table whether they were still adding coal though.
It is true that we are a long way from replacing coal even with gas.
Btw, i've seen a good explanation of why they are investing in clean energy and coal at the same time. Basically their main goal is energy independence, they don't want to depend on oil but they have a lot of coal.
То у них собаки лают, то руины говорят… при всем моем бипартизанстве респы идут с отрывом, это просто назад по пещерам Что вы от них хотите, сейчас везде будет весело, с такими назначенцами Я «поражена , потрясена и удивлена», какие персонажи у власти, Кафка
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
This one is even better although not quite so salacious.
US Energy department posted the following on X a day ago:
"Wind and solar energy infrastructure is essentially worthless when it is dark outside, and when the wind is not blowing."
no subject
Найдите выступление техасца, члена комитета по науке, космосу и технологиям про таяние льда и реакцию Джона Стюарта))
Everything’s bigger in Texas, even the stupid
no subject
But DOE used to be a serious organization, with high level physicists, even Nobel prize winners, leading it. Compare it to this caveman-level nonsense they are spouting now.
no subject
You don't mean the claim that solar doesn't work during the night, do you?
no subject
no subject
So, what nonsense are you talking about.
no subject
> So, what nonsense are you talking about.
The energy infrastructure is obviously not worthless, even if it does not produce energy continuously. This is like saying that my furniture is worthless when I am not at home.
no subject
no subject
The more interesting question is why DOE feels compelled to post this. The likely answer is that they are simply parroting Trump who keeps saying such things to disparage wind/solar.
no subject
Посмотрите кто у них сейчас главный. Пустили козла в огород
no subject
Where do they even get those morons..
no subject
Это сильно!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
https://heatmap.news/politics/chris-wright-twitter
no subject
This is for idiots who believe that we can completely get rid of fossil fuels.
no subject
In any case, getting rid of fossil fuels will take a long time, but they can be mostly replaced for electric power generation by some combination of nuclear/renewables. Nuclear needs to be a lot cheaper though.
no subject
no subject
no subject
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-fossil-fuel-consumption?time=2009..latest
no subject
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/electricity-generation-from-solar-and-wind-compared-to-coal
https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
The growth in Chinese energy consumption recently comes primarily from renewable energy: https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/china-energy-transition-review-2025/
no subject
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_China
There's a chart there that show that energy production grows from all sources:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/Electricity_production_in_China.svg/2560px-Electricity_production_in_China.svg.png
no subject
If you look at the table by year, the change in solar from 2023 to 2024 is massive and accounts for almost 50% of the total change (most of the rest is hydro + wind, I was surprised nuclear did not increase much).
no subject
That's just one year. And they are still adding coal.
no subject
It is true that we are a long way from replacing coal even with gas.
no subject
Forget about replacing. It will take decades for "green" power to catch up with fossils.
no subject
Yeah, it will take a while.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Что вы от них хотите, сейчас везде будет весело, с такими назначенцами
Я «поражена , потрясена и удивлена», какие персонажи у власти, Кафка
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ачетакова - именно, после всех судимостей и высказываний…(